Controversial emails just surfaced in The Intercept and The Nation. Unredacted ones. They show that when everyone in the industry believed COVID leaked from a lab in China, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins pressured all the experts into agreement that it didn’t. After Fauci forced a consensus, scientific journal Nature Medicine made it airtight official.
Unredacted emails tell all
Just when you thought the COVID-19 rabbit hole couldn’t go any deeper into the Deep State, it took a surprise plunge with a fascinating twist, through newly disclosed emails. The carved in stone official story that SARS-CoV-2 spontaneously appeared, all on its own, was practically handwritten by Dr. Deep State himself, Anthony Fauci.
He had everyone in the world of epidemiology cowed into total submission, despite their own private beliefs on the true origin.
Across the globe, locked down and totally un-vaccinated citizens were in full-on panic mode in 2020. It’s a spooky coincidence that the year’s commemorative U.S quarter featured a bat. (Linking that up takes way too much “tinfoil” but someday there may be a story on it.)
Unredacted NIH records detail early efforts to rule out lab origin of Covid — my latest for @theintercept and @thenation. It took more than a year of #FOIA litigation to obtain the documents featured in this story: https://t.co/U1Lqq4ZgHS
— Jimmy Tobias (@JamesCTobias) January 19, 2023
On March 17 of that year, the scientific journal Nature Medicine published a paper. Fauci’s emails have a huge connection. “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was supposedly written by “five renowned academic scientists.” All under orders from Fauci on what to say.
That paper “played an important early role in shaping the debate about a fiercely controversial topic: the origin of the virus that has killed millions.” The whole paper was supposed to settle the question once and for all.
“Did it spill from animals to humans in nature, on a farm, in a market? Or did it leak from a lab like the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a leading center of coronavirus research in China?” Just like recent elections and FBI investigations into Biden family crimes, emails prove the fix was in.
Everyone pointed to the lab
According to the final word as spelled out in the paper, “our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated construct.” Near the end, they added, “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”
That should have settled it. What they don’t say is that originally, they all thought the exact opposite. Fauci’s emails detail how he talked them out of it, with the help of Dr. Francis Collins.
Unredacted emails show “that in the early days of the pandemic, Fauci and Collins took part in a series of email exchanges and telephone calls in which several leading virologists expressed concern that SARS-CoV-2 looked potentially ‘engineered.‘”
BREAKING NEWS: International Criminal Investigation calls on every public citizen to recommend indictments for Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Pfizer, BlackRock, Tedros and Christian Drosten for pushing everyone to receive the ineffective highly dangerous lethal experimental vaccines. pic.twitter.com/XbpHWBWts0
— Truth Justice ™ (@SpartaJustice) January 17, 2023
They even had which procedures narrowed down that allowed it to happen. After a week of hearing all the lab leak theories, Fauci set the focus on the groups work to “disprove any type of lab theory.”
The emails show that Fauci practically ordered them to debunk their own opinions in favor of any almost-plausible natural explanation they could work with. The idea of allowing the conclusion to point at “engineering,” any sort of a lab, and especially, Wuhan.
Even though they were “puzzled” by “the presence in the virus’s genome of a furin cleavage site, which is a feature that has not been found in other SARS-related coronaviruses.” It looked like designer gene splicing because the “furin cleavage site plays an important role in helping the virus infect human airway cells.” They had “a hard time explaining that as an event outside the lab.” They found a way.
